A 100mm-thick V-die does not fail quietly. When it breaks under load, it sounds like a gunshot. I still keep a jagged, two-pound fragment of D2 steel on my desk from a Tuesday afternoon in 2008, when a "premium" hardened punch exploded halfway through a heavy plate bend. It missed a kid’s head by three inches.

That piece of shrapnel reminds me every day that spec sheets can be misleading. When a tool chips or wears out too soon, the instinct is to open the catalog and order the hardest alloy you can afford. You believe you are buying durability.

In fact, you are not fixing the problem. You are only changing how your tooling will fail.

Related: Press Brake Tooling Materials
Related: Guide to Press Brakes

The "Wear vs. Shatter" Trap: Why Your Recent Tool Breakage Is Leading You the Wrong Way

Think of tooling as a prizefighter. A boxer with a fragile jaw who focuses solely on punching power might win a few early rounds, but the first solid hook will knock him down. Steel behaves similarly. We often discuss "hardness" and "toughness" as if they were interchangeable, but in metallurgy, they are opposing forces.

Hardness means resistance to wear—the ability to rub against sheet metal thousands of times without losing the edge. Toughness means the ability to withstand impact. It is the steel’s capacity to absorb shock, flex on a microscopic level, and return to its original shape without cracking. As hardness increases, toughness usually decreases. You exchange gradual, predictable wear for sudden, violent failure. Why do we continue making that trade?

Is your current tooling truly failing from abrasion, or is the tonnage simply exceeding its yield strength?

Take a magnifying glass and inspect the radius of a retired punch. If you see a smooth, polished flat where the tip once was, that indicates abrasive wear. The sheet metal has gradually ground the steel away. But if you see a mushroomed tip, fine spiderweb cracks, or a slight bend in the shank, abrasion is not the cause. The tonnage has simply overpowered the steel’s yield strength.

Yield strength is the precise point at which steel stops behaving like a rubber band and starts behaving like clay. Once that point is exceeded, the deformation is permanent. Many operators see a deformed, mushroomed punch and immediately blame "soft" steel, assuming the surface has worn down. But the surface did not wear away; the entire underlying structure collapsed under the ram’s force. If you mistake a yield strength failure for an abrasion issue, your next decision will be costly. What happens when you try to address structural collapse by hardening only the surface?

The instinctive move toward maximum hardness: What happens to the tool’s core when you focus solely on surface wear?

Suppose you respond to that mushroomed punch by ordering a high-carbon tool steel hardened to 60 HRC (Rockwell Hardness). You have addressed the wear issue. The surface is now effectively like a file. But beneath that extremely hard exterior, the tool’s core has become dangerously brittle.

When a heavy plate strikes the die, the applied tonnage drives shockwaves through the tool. A tough, ductile core absorbs that energy, flexing just enough to endure. A uniformly hard, brittle core cannot flex; it simply fractures. This is why the most effective modern tooling uses a gradient—induction-hardening the outer surface to a wear-resistant 55–58 HRC while keeping the core at a ductile, impact-absorbing 30–35 HRC. If you purchase a tool that is through-hardened solely to meet a catalog specification, you are effectively creating a glass hammer. You may resolve the surface wear issue, but you ensure a catastrophic break. Why, then, does the industry continue to promote one particular alloy as a universal solution?

When "widely used" quietly becomes "used by default": The hidden cost of blindly trusting 42CrMo

Review any standard tooling catalog and 42CrMo (or its equivalent) appears everywhere. It is the vanilla ice cream of the fabrication industry. It is inexpensive, machines exceptionally well, and when properly plasma-nitrided, provides an excellent low-friction surface that resists wear. Because it performs so effectively for standard 2 mm mild steel brackets, it became the default choice.

However, "default" does not mean "invincible." Specification sheets advertise a yield strength exceeding 900 MPa for 42CrMo, but in the fine print this value applies only to cross-sections up to 16 mm thick. Increase that same alloy to a massive 100 mm V-die for heavy plate applications, and the yield strength drops to roughly 550 MPa. The thicker the tool, the weaker the core becomes. If you rely uncritically on the 42CrMo default for high-tonnage bending, you are basing your safety margins on numbers that do not apply. Surface treatments may temporarily conceal the weakness by keeping friction low and wear under control, but beneath the surface the core remains highly stressed.

Check your scrap bin. Look beyond routine cut-offs and examine the heavy bending dies that failed prematurely. Are they evenly worn, or are they cracked, mushroomed, and split?

42CrMo: The Industry Workhorse (And Exactly Where It Fails)

If your heavy 42CrMo dies are failing under high-tonnage plate bending, the immediate reaction may be to abandon the alloy and order a solid block of D2 tool steel. Do not do this. The appropriate specification for safely handling heavy plate is not a harder, more brittle core; it is preserving a ductile, shock-absorbing core while substantially increasing the die’s shoulder radius and applying a deep case-hardening treatment to manage localized friction. Before discarding 42CrMo, it is necessary to understand why it dominates the shop floor and exactly where the calculations cease to hold.

Where 42CrMo earns its reputation: Medium tonnage, mixed-part production

In laboratory testing, a properly heat-treated 42CrMo die outperforms harder D2 and A2 tool steels in approximately 80% of routine bending applications. That is a significant success rate and explains why this alloy is the established benchmark in job shops.

When the morning shift is air-bending 16-gauge mild steel and the afternoon shift is forming 1/4-inch aluminum brackets, extreme wear resistance is unnecessary. What is required is tolerance to error. 42CrMo provides a well-balanced combination of toughness, strength, and wear resistance. Metallurgically, it can withstand impact. If an operator accidentally bottoms out the ram or double-feeds a blank, 42CrMo will flex and absorb the shockwave, whereas a harder, more brittle alloy might fracture. It is the duct tape of the press brake environment—economical, dependable, and well suited to the unpredictable, mixed-part conditions of medium-tonnage fabrication.

The exact tonnage and thickness where 42CrMo crosses from reliable to a liability

We have already established that 42CrMo’s yield strength drops from 900 MPa to about 550 MPa when scaled up to massive heavy-plate dies. But where, precisely, is the red line?

The calculations become problematic at around 85 tons per meter on material thicker than 8mm (5/16"). When bending heavy plate, a larger V-opening is typically used, which distributes the load. However, the moment you attempt to coin that heavy plate, or switch to a tighter V-opening to achieve a specific inside radius, the localized pressure at the die shoulder rises exponentially. With an actual yield strength of 550 MPa in that thick cross-section, the steel can no longer withstand the concentrated force of the heavy plate sliding over the shoulder. The die does not merely wear down; it physically collapses. You are expecting a weakened core to support a failing structure. At this red line, the issue is no longer just tool steel selection but load management across the entire forming system—this is where a synchronized, high-tonnage solution such as a tandem press brake from ADH Machine Tool, built within a fully CNC-based bending portfolio for demanding heavy-plate applications, becomes a practical way to distribute force, maintain precision, and avoid concentrating destructive stress in a single station.

What happens when you push 42CrMo past 10,000 thin-gauge bends?

Now consider the opposite scenario. Take the same 42CrMo tooling, remove the heavy plate, and set up a 10,000-piece run of 18-gauge 304 stainless steel. The tonnage is low, so core strength is no longer the limiting factor.

However, stainless steel work-hardens as soon as forming begins, turning the bend line into a microscopic file that drags across the die shoulders. Standard 42CrMo, even when flame-hardened, typically reaches only about 50 to 55 HRC. Under the constant, abrasive friction of work-hardened stainless, that surface hardness is insufficient. Around the 3,000th bend, the die shoulders begin to gall, accumulating microscopic flakes of stainless. By bend 10,000, the shoulders are scored, bend angles drift by two degrees, and operators continually shim the bed to offset the material loss. The alloy withstood the tonnage, but it was consumed by friction.

Is the alloy's toughness protecting your operation, or merely concealing a surface hardness deficiency?

This leads to one of the most significant traps in tooling catalogs. When standard 42CrMo wears out prematurely during high-volume stainless runs, fabricators conclude that the alloy itself is inferior. They immediately order D2 tool steel.

I once observed a shop make this exact switch to address a wear issue on a louver punch. Three weeks later, the D2 punch shattered under a slight over-tonnage, and a fragment narrowly missed a young worker’s head by three inches. Why is this trade made repeatedly? The shop did not require a different core alloy; it needed a different surface treatment. Recent field data from ADH Machine Tool showed that applying a gas-nitriding treatment to standard 42CrMo4 tripled die lifespan and completely eliminated edge chipping. Nitriding increased the surface hardness beyond 60 HRC to resist abrasion, while keeping the core ductile enough to absorb press shock. The inherent toughness of untreated 42CrMo provides a safety margin, but relying on it alone obscures the fact that its unprotected surface cannot endure high-friction conditions.

Inspect your scrap bin. Take a worn-out punch used for thin-gauge stainless and run your fingernail across its tip. If it catches on deep grooves and galling, the surface hardness failed long before the core experienced significant stress.

T8/T10 vs. Cr12MoV: The Same Wear Problem, Opposing Engineering Approaches

Once shops recognize that untreated 42CrMo cannot withstand abrasive friction, they ask how to correctly specify a gas-nitriding treatment. The engineering guidance is clear: instruct the heat treater to achieve a 0.15 mm case depth at 60 HRC, while maintaining the core at a shock-absorbing 30 HRC. However, on the shop floor, the purchasing manager sees a three-week lead time for custom nitriding, becomes concerned, and turns to a tooling catalog to purchase a completely different alloy that is available off the shelf.

They typically make one of two choices. Either they step down to a high-carbon steel like T8 or T10 to cut costs, or they commit fully to the "infinite wear" promise of Cr12MoV. Both options are reactive attempts to address the same surface-wear issue we just identified, but they approach it from opposite—and equally risky—extremes.

Hardness and toughness move in opposite directions—so which one do you give up?

Metallurgy operates like a zero-sum game on a seesaw. One end represents hardness, which determines wear resistance. The other represents toughness, the steel’s capacity to absorb impact without fracturing. You cannot maximize both at the same time.

Consider the baseline carbon steels. Recent testing by Qilu Steel indicates that T8 reaches a solid 55 to 60 HRC while retaining sufficient toughness to withstand impact. Moving up to T10, the higher carbon content raises hardness to 58 to 62 HRC. That modest gain in wear resistance carries a tradeoff: T10 gives up some of T8’s shock-absorbing capacity and has more difficulty achieving uniform hardening in larger die blocks. If you purchase a tool that is fully hardened merely to meet a catalog specification, you are effectively creating a glass hammer. You are exchanging a few additional Rockwell points for a deliberate reduction in the tool’s ability to endure a sudden spike in tonnage.

Carbon steels (T8/T10): A cost-saving compromise, or a targeted solution for specific short-run profiles?

According to tooling data from LMRM, T8 and T10 score only two out of five stars for wear resistance, with heat resistance rated at just one star. On paper, they appear to be nothing more than a budget option.

However, shops that completely rule out carbon steel may be misinterpreting the physics of short-run fabrication. Picture a shop producing 50-piece batches of thin-gauge aluminum, where operators change setups three times per shift. In this setting, tools are frequently dropped, knocked, and misaligned. T8 becomes advantageous here because its lower carbon content helps it maintain dimensional stability under impact. It hardens uniformly, even in thicker sections, and tolerates the routine handling abuse associated with high-mix, low-volume production.

Place that same T10 punch into a continuous stamping operation, however, and its poor heat resistance ensures the edge will dull before the operator finishes lunch. Wear accelerates quickly. Carbon steels are not designed as production workhorses; they function as sacrificial shock absorbers for unstable setups.

Cr12MoV promises unlimited wear resistance—but what happens when a bend shifts slightly off-center?

At the opposite end of the range is Cr12MoV. Tooling manuals often describe it as offering a reliable balance of hardness, toughness, and wear resistance across many applications.

Catalog specifications are meaningless.

Cr12MoV contains a high concentration of chromium and molybdenum carbides, enabling it to process abrasive materials such as work-hardened stainless steel for extended periods without significant edge loss. Yet those same carbides also create an extremely rigid internal structure. If the ram descends slightly off-center because of a worn gib or an operator feeding a blank with a heavy burr, the lateral load on the die shoulder rises immediately. With almost no capacity for deformation, Cr12MoV cannot absorb this unexpected stress vector. Once the off-center force exceeds its tensile limit, that glass-hard punch will shatter like a dropped beer bottle. Claims of "reliable performance" assume perfect press alignment, flawless crowning, and consistent material thickness—conditions that rarely exist in an actual fabrication shop.

Surface Hardness vs. Core Strength: Which failure mode are you actually trying to eliminate?

Every time you change alloys, you are simply deciding how you want your tool to fail. Cr12MoV resists friction exceptionally well but fails violently under shock. T8 withstands shock effectively but wears down gradually from friction.

This is precisely why replacing 42CrMo with a solid block of ultra-hard steel is usually an error. When you purchase solid Cr12MoV, you are paying for 60 HRC through the entire core, which you do not require, while accepting a catastrophic shattering risk, which you cannot tolerate. You are attempting to address a surface issue by changing the core material.

Go check your scrap bin. Pull out a shattered piece of high-alloy tooling and a rounded, mushroomed carbon steel punch. The carbon steel failed from fatigue; the high-alloy failed from blunt impact. If you cannot determine which of these two failure modes is consuming your tooling budget, no catalog specification will solve the problem.

The Matrix: Matching Tooling Material to Your Production Reality

You need a wear-resistant surface and a shock-absorbing core, yet you cannot afford the three-week lead time required to send a custom profile out for deep-case nitriding. The industry's default reaction is to purchase a harder block of steel off the shelf. We have already shown that this is a trap. The answer is not to search for a mythical universal alloy, but to align your specific production reality—your material, your bending method, your operating speed—with the physical limits of the steel. You need to construct a matrix.

Bending abrasive stainless vs. forgiving mild steel: Which property determines the tool's survival?

Bending 304 stainless steel, with a tensile strength of about 515 MPa, increases punch wear by 30 to 50 percent compared with standard mild steel. This occurs even when premium 42CrMo tooling is used. Most engineers observe the accelerated wear, assume the stainless is simply exceeding the tool's hardness, and immediately specify a harder die.

Why do we continue making this trade-off?

Stainless steel does more than scratch your tooling; it cold-welds to it. Its high chromium content generates significant friction under bending pressure, causing microscopic particles of the sheet to tear away and adhere to the punch tip. This is galling. When you use a harder, uncoated steel, you are merely offering a more rigid surface for the stainless to bond to. One shop running heavy stainless batches eventually stopped pursuing higher Rockwell hardness and instead applied a 2- to 3-micron PVD TiCN coating to their standard, tough 42CrMo dies. By increasing lubricity rather than bulk hardness, they reduced friction, eliminated adhesion scratches, and preserved the core's capacity to absorb impact.

Check your scrap bin. If your stainless tooling shows a silver, smeared buildup on the radius, your tools are not simply wearing out—they are being damaged by adhesion.

Air bending vs. bottoming: How the selected forming method redistributes stress on the punch tip

Consider the mechanics of air bending. The sheet sits on the two shoulders of the V-die, and the punch descends only far enough to reach the target angle, accounting for springback. The stress is spread out. The main risk is sliding friction along the punch flanks as the material moves downward. In this case, surface lubricity and moderate wear resistance are required.

Given that ADH Machine Tool's product portfolio is 100% CNC-based and covers high-end scenarios in laser cutting, bending, grooving, shearing, for teams evaluating practical options here, CNC Press Brake is a relevant next step.

Now consider bottoming. The punch forces the material firmly into the V-die, imprinting the exact angle into the sheet. At the very end of the stroke, tonnage rises exponentially. All that kinetic energy is concentrated into the microscopic radius of the punch tip.

I once observed a bottoming operation on 1/4-inch plate using a fully hardened, monolithic high-carbon punch. The tip shattered under localized pressure, missing a child’s head by three inches.

In bottom bending, the forming method shifts the failure mode from flank wear to catastrophic compressive overload. Surface hardness is not the priority; substantial core toughness is. For air bending, coatings address friction. For bottoming, tempering addresses impact.

High-speed bending vs. heavy plate forming: How ram speed alters the metallurgical survival rules

Modern electric press brakes drive rams downward at 200 millimeters per second. At such speeds, friction between the sheet and the die produces intense, localized thermal shock. Steel loses yield strength as temperature increases. A punch rated at 50 HRC at room temperature may effectively perform at 40 HRC at the microscopic contact point during a high-speed run.

Given that ADH Machine Tool's product portfolio is 100% CNC-based and covers high-end scenarios in laser cutting, bending, grooving, shearing, for teams evaluating practical options here, Electric Press Brake is a relevant next step.

The speed effectively erodes your metallurgical defenses.

Heavy plate forming operates under different conditions. The ram advances slowly, but the tonnage needed to yield 8mm plate is substantial. There is no thermal shock. Instead, a gradual, crushing mechanical load threatens to mushroom the punch tip or split the die shoulder. The same tooling strategy cannot be applied to both processes. High-speed bending requires thermal stability and low-friction coatings to dissipate heat, whereas heavy plate forming requires a large, uniform grain structure that resists plastic deformation under sustained compressive force.

Cost Per Tool vs. Cost Per 100,000 Bends: At what production volume does premium material justify itself?

Applying 42CrMo across all materials—from thin, forgiving aluminum to abrasive stainless steel—is a convenient practice that gradually reduces profit. Using a premium, coated tool for a light aluminum run ties up capital unnecessarily; the tool may outlast the press brake. Conversely, selecting an inexpensive, uncoated carbon steel die for continuous stainless stamping ensures frequent replacements, disrupting production and diminishing margins.

The actual cost of a tool equals its purchase price divided by the number of flawless bends it produces before failure.

If a PVD-coated die costs three times more but endures ten times as many stainless bends without galling, the premium material has justified its cost quickly. However, if the shop runs only fifty pieces of that profile per year, the expensive die becomes idle capital on a rack. The matrix requires aligning the metallurgical investment with the contract volume.

Even the most carefully calculated cost-per-bend ratio falls apart if the human factor breaks down. More than 30 percent of punch failures are directly caused by operator mistakes, such as forcing a sharp-edged punch into thick plate or skipping the trial bend altogether. You can design the ideal balance between hardness and toughness, but no heat treatment can protect against a poor setup.

The Variables That Override Even the Perfect Material Choice

Imagine purchasing a five-thousand-dollar custom suit and then letting a toddler adjust the hem with safety scissors. That is effectively what happens when you invest thousands in precisely engineered, high-toughness tooling and then hand it to an operator who fails to verify ram alignment.

You cannot solve a bad setup through metallurgical engineering.

We devote so much attention to the steel’s chemical composition that we overlook the fact that the steel is only one component in a violent mechanical system. If that system is compromised, the tooling will fail. However, before attributing every cracked punch to operator error, you must rule out the hidden variables that resemble material failure.

Deep hardening vs. surface quenching: Could your "failed" material simply be the result of an inexpensive heat treatment?

Steel does not leave the mill ready to bend heavy plate. It must be heat-treated.

When heat-treating a tool, the goal is to balance surface hardness with core toughness—its capacity to absorb impact. But heat treatment is costly, and catalog suppliers often reduce expenses by using surface quenching. They rapidly cool the exterior to achieve a marketable 50 HRC, while leaving the core comparatively soft. Under heavy tonnage, that soft interior deforms. The hardened outer shell, lacking solid support beneath it, eventually collapses.

The opposite extreme is equally destructive. I once collected the shattered pieces of a premium bottoming die that exploded during its third shift, sending a jagged fragment through a heavy-duty shop fan. The material specification was flawless. However, the heat treater pursued an aggressive hardness target by quenching the steel too rapidly without a proper tempering cycle. This traps significant residual stress—essentially a tightly wound spring of energy locked inside the steel. When the press brake applied pressure, that internal spring released, and the die shattered. Excessively aggressive hardening produces the brittleness it is meant to avoid.

Check your scrap bin. If a die split cleanly down the center while the working edge shows no wear, you did not purchase inferior steel—you purchased inadequate heat treatment.

Alignment, die V-width, and the machine variables no tooling steel can compensate for

Even properly heat-treated steel cannot withstand a physics problem it was never designed to handle.

Running your press brake at full capacity does not cause immediate tool failure, but it significantly accelerates fatigue in every alloy available. When you push a tool to its yield strength—the point at which the metal stops resisting and begins to deform—you are quietly shortening its service life. No chemical composition can fully offset sustained overload.

The most frequent cause is the die V-width. Attempting to air-bend heavy, high-tensile plate over a die opening that is too narrow causes the required tonnage to increase exponentially. The material does not simply bend; it binds. The stored springback energy has no path to dissipate. In one severe case, a 10mm high-tensile plate bent over a narrow die experienced a sudden brittle fracture along the bend line. The workpiece shattered and was ejected from the press like a mortar shell. When you deny the bend sufficient leverage, you turn a forming operation into an explosion.

Misalignment produces a similar effect on a smaller scale. If your ram is out of parallel by even a fraction of a millimeter, the punch forces the sheet metal harder into one side of the V-die than the other. At that point, you are no longer bending—you are shearing.

Inspect your scrap bin. If the shoulders of your V-dies are heavily galled or visibly rolled outward on one side but remain pristine on the other, your ram is misaligned, and your machine is destroying your tooling.

A Practical Selection Framework (Built from Your Shop, Not Catalog Claims)

You now understand that poor heat treatment or an improper setup can ruin even excellent steel. Your immediate challenge is determining whom to trust with your tooling budget and how to prevent operators from treating precision equipment carelessly. Evaluate a tooling supplier by requesting their tempering curves, not their marketing materials. If they can provide only a surface Rockwell hardness value but cannot explain their through-hardening process, walk away.

For readers who want concrete specifications rather than sales claims, reviewing detailed technical documentation is the next logical step. ADH Machine Tool provides downloadable brochures with machine configurations, application scopes, and technical parameters across its fully CNC-based bending and sheet metal solutions, supported by dedicated R&D and testing capabilities. You can review the available documentation here: Download the technical brochures.

To correct your standard operating procedures, you must remove guesswork from the setup. If your machine’s hydraulic pressure fluctuates by more than 1.5 MPa, or your ram sensors are drifting, the resulting shockwaves will destroy any alloy you install.

If you are seeing unstable pressure curves, inconsistent ram positioning, or unexplained tooling failures, it may be time to review both your machine condition and control logic with a specialist. ADH Machine Tool invests over 8% of its annual revenue into R&D across press brakes, automation, and intelligent equipment, with dedicated testing capabilities to diagnose real-world performance issues. You can contact the technical team to discuss calibration checks, hydraulic stability, sensor verification, and overall system optimization before further tooling damage occurs.

Calibration must be your mandatory Step Zero.

Once your machine is properly aligned and your supplier is reliable, you can build a selection framework grounded in the physics of your actual shop.

Step 1: Start with tonnage and thickness to define your baseline stress

Every tooling decision starts with the force required to move metal. Tonnage and thickness establish the baseline stress your punch and die must withstand, but the workpiece chemistry determines how that force behaves. If you are bending 304 stainless steel, you are working with a material that requires significantly more force than mild steel and actively drags against the tool surface. That friction can accelerate wear by up to 50 percent.

However, tonnage is only part of the equation if your geometry is incorrect. High-strength, low-ductility plates require larger punch radii and wider die openings to manage the substantial stored springback energy. If you attempt to force a 10mm high-tensile plate into a tight V-die, you are not bending metal—you are creating an explosive situation. The workpiece will bind, the tonnage will surge, and the plate may fracture violently along the bend line. No tooling alloy can withstand a fundamental geometry error. Review your setup sheets. If your SOPs do not require specific die-to-thickness ratios before a job is loaded, your tooling is already at risk.

Step 2: Identify your primary failure mode—wear, cracking, or deformation?

Once your geometry is set, you must determine how your tools are actually failing. Tooling steel does not simply wear out; it fails due to a specific mechanism. Wear is a gradual, abrasive failure driven by friction. Cracking is a sudden, catastrophic failure caused by fatigue or shock. Deformation is yielding, where the tool’s core lacks the structural strength to maintain its shape under high tonnage.

I once examined a shattered high-carbon punch that exploded while air-bending heavy plate; it missed a young worker’s head by three inches. The shop had purchased the hardest steel available because they were frustrated with punches wearing out. They solved the wear issue by creating a fragmentation hazard. They failed to understand that hardness and toughness—the steel’s ability to absorb impact without breaking—exist in a zero-sum relationship.

Inspect your scrap bin. If the working edges of discarded dies are rolled over like mushroom caps, you have a deformation issue. If the profiles are severely galled and scored, you have a wear issue. If the tools are cleanly split in two, you have a cracking issue.

Step 3: Match the alloy to the failure mode—not to popularity

This is the point at which you select your steel. Do not default to 42CrMo simply because it is the most commonly used option, and do not purchase a premium tool solely because it carries a high price. Align the metallurgical characteristics directly with the evidence in your scrap bin.

If your primary failure mode is wear from high-friction stainless runs, you need an alloy with high carbon content and vanadium carbides, or a specialized PVD coating, to resist galling. If your tools are cracking under the severe shock of thick plate, you must trade some surface hardness for a high-toughness, shock-resistant tool steel that can flex without fracturing. If you purchase a tool hardened throughout merely to meet a catalog specification, you are creating a glass hammer.

Why do we continue to make this trade-off?

Because we want a single, ideal piece of steel that performs every function flawlessly. It does not exist. The true "best" material is simply the one that directly counteracts the specific forces attempting to destroy it on your shop floor. Stop searching for the ultimate alloy and start paying attention to what your broken tools are indicating.